Page 129 - Technical Cooperation Project for Building Capacity for Can Tho University...

Chapter 4 Results of Joint Review

6) Contents of the interview survey

Target Group
No. Questions asked
(Interviewee)

1 Students (1) Purpose, reason of participation in the programs
(2) Plan of applying knowledge gained from the programs for work after
completing the program.
(3) Advantages and disadvantages of the wide variety of students of the
programs (fresh graduate students, local government staff, workers
and staff from private companies…)

(4) Model lectures and Japanese lecturers
(5) Plan of keeping contact with the lecturers and School/Department/
CTU after completing the programs
2 Lecturers & (1) Advantages of the model lectures given by the Japanese lecturers
Managing Staff (content, methods of teaching, teaching materials, English…)
(2) Advantages and disadvantages of co-lecturing with the Japanese
lecturers
(3) Preferred period of continuing model lecturers, and its reason.

(4) Expectation from the model lecture and the Japanese lecturers
(5) Desired improvement, enhancing quality and effectiveness relating to
the model lectures and the Japanese lecturers
4.3.4 Results of Survey for Students

1) Questionnaire survey for students

a) Average ratio of selective questionnaires to each target students

< 1st Cohort (Agriculture: 11 Students) >
Satisfaction Level (Average of each category)
Category of Questions 0 1 2 3 4 5
(No. of selective questions) Undecided Less than 30 - 50% 50% 50 - 80% More
30% than 80%
Feedback on the new
1 0.00 0.00 1.01 21.21 45.45 32.32
master’s program (4)
Feedback on the support
2 1.05 0.00 0.70 23.08 44.41 30.77
services and activities (11)
Feedback on the teaching
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.18 38.38 43.43
activities (9)
Feedback on the master’s
4 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.18 47.11 34.71
thesis process (5)
5 Other feedback (4) 2.27 0.00 0.00 18.18 50.00 29.55
Average of all Categories: 0.66 0.00 0.34 19.77 45.07 34.16

102