Page 131 - Technical Cooperation Project for Building Capacity for Can Tho University...
P. 131

Chapter 4  Results of Joint Review



                                nd
                             < 2  Cohort (Agriculture: 61 Students from Vinh Long Province) >
             Category of Questions                Satisfaction Level (Average of each category)
                                           0            1          2          3           4           5
                (No. of selective                   Less than                                    More than
                   questions)         Undecided       30%      30 - 50%      50%      50 - 80%      80%


                 Feedback on the
              1  new master’s            0.00          0.00       0.00       4.55       17.85       77.60
                 program (4)
                 Feedback on the
              2  support services        0.44          0.38       0.76       6.13       17.76       74.54
                 and activities (11)
                 Feedback on the
              3  teaching activities     0.00          0.00       0.00       3.47       11.86       84.67
                 (9)
                 Feedback on the
              4  master’s thesis         0.45          0.00       0.15       4.19       16.75       78.46
                 process (5)

              5  Other feedback (4)      0.41          0.00       0.00       4.94       11.10       83.55
             Average of all              0.26         0.08        0.18       4.66      15.06        79.76
             Categories:

                     b) Frequent/ remarkable answers to four (4) descriptive questions for students


               (No. of the same or similar answers/ Total No. of respondents)
            [Question No. 1: In your opinion, what should Can Tho University and the lecturers do or modify in
            order to enhance the quality of the master study program?]


               - Need more practical sessions/ activities/ field trips, not only theory (Agr: 10/26, VL: 4/61)

               - Provide more books, learning materials for students to research (VL: 11/61)
               - Very good, satisfied, etc. (Agr: 1/26, VL: 7/61)

               - Need to re-arrange or modify the subjects (Env: 4/14, VL: 1/61)
               - Need more English subjects/ need to create motivation for student to study English (Agr: 4/26)
            [Question No. 2: In your opinion, what should the lecturer do to enhance the quality of teaching?]

                 - Satisfied/ very good/ interesting about lecturers / teaching performance (Agr: 2/26, VL: 4/61)

                 - Increase lecture sessions (Agr: 4/26)
                 - More introduction and instruction of using software and facilities (Agr: 3/26)

                 - Need more communication/ interaction with students (Env: 2/14)

            [Question No. 3: In general, what do you think about the model lectures by Japanese professors?]

                 - Practical, useful, broad/ updated/ detailed information (Agr: 12/26, Env: 3/14, VL: 2/61)
                 - Good lecturing, high quality (Agr: 2/26, Env: 1/14)


       104
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136